Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Eaton
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
While in the previous decision in the case (Eaton v. Eaton, 81 N. H. 275) it was held that the fund was to be used for the beneficiary and his family, the case did not determine who the family were. This question is one of construction of the instrument creating the trust, the language of which appears in the opinion ■ of the previous decision, which opinion does not consider and define what persons made up the family as included within the testator’s provisions for his son’s needs. This question was not involved so as to be in issue.
By the decision, the fund is to be used for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eaton v. EatonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- Gardner v. O'LoughlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
- Ellis v. AldrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
- Cram v. CramSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. RubionTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Keller v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Robison v. Elston Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.