Smith v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county dismissing the action, entered pursuant to the order of Simpson, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant entered pursuant to the order of the trial court on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The basis of the judgment' appears from the judgment roll and on the face of the judgment; hence no bill of exceptions or settled case is necessary in order to secure a review of the judgment. See Peach v. Reed, 87 Minn. 375, 92 N. W. 229.
The question here to be decided is whether the complaint states facts-sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Stated briefly, such facts are these: Prior to October 1, 1900, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peach v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Borton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Neer v. SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Marano v. North Bergen Twp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Dunmore Realty Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Hatcher v. Brown, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1932