Legal Opinion
Bogaski v. County of Allegheny
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00487PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Lisa Pupo Lenihan, United States Magistrate Judge
I. Summation
For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s August 11, 2016 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50) will be granted as to Plaintiffs- claim of disparate impact in violation of Title VII, and denied in its remainder. Plaintiffs August 9, 2016 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45) will be denied.
*478This case was filed by Complaint on April 12, 2015 (ECF No. 1), and Amended on July 6, 2015 (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff, who resigned from Defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Haines v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025