Rogers v. Eavenson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Enumerations of error 1 and 2 complain of the trial judge’s failure to charge the defendant’s written requests. The requests were respectively as follows: (1) "I charge you that every person must exercise ordinary care for his own safety. What is ordinary care under varying circumstances is a question to be determined by the jury. In this connection, I charge you that it is for you to determine whether a driver of an automobile about to enter an intersection which is controlled by a traffic light is in the exercise of ordinary care if he enters that intersection without…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eddleman v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Shockey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Central Container Corp. v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Johnson v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Lusk v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975