Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Eavenson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1971No. 46071PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

Enumerations of error 1 and 2 complain of the trial judge’s failure to charge the defendant’s written requests. The requests were respectively as follows: (1) "I charge you that every person must exercise ordinary care for his own safety. What is ordinary care under varying circumstances is a question to be determined by the jury. In this connection, I charge you that it is for you to determine whether a driver of an automobile about to enter an intersection which is controlled by a traffic light is in the exercise of ordinary care if he enters that intersection without…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eddleman v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Shockey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Central Container Corp. v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Johnson v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Lusk v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API