Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1964No. 40590PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff in error relies heavily upon the case of Farkas v. Kaufman, 108 Ga. App. 659 (134 SE2d 488), contending in effect that Farkas is authority for the proposition that a petition alleging that two joint tortfeasors each failed to yield the right of way to the other’s vehicle is in the alternative and thus is subject to general demurrer, since the petition, being construed against the pleader, is subject to the inference that each of the defendants had the right of way and thus neither would be negligent in proceeding into the intersection. That contention,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Eddleman v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Laseter v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Central Container Corp. v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Powers v. PateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meeks v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Harrison v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Justice v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Lindsay v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Roberts v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API