Home Insurance v. Wickham
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Dunklin Circuit Court. — Hon. W. S. G. Walker, Judge. The circuit court erred in holding that the claim was barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations. Laws 1911, p. 82; Knisely v. Leathe, 2*56 Mo. 341.
1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.
This is an action against the defendant as administrator de bonis now of the estate of J. A. Wick-ham, deceased, and is to recover on a promissory note for one hundred and four dollars, payable in four instalments, all of which, under the terms of the instrument, were due when the action was commenced. The note'was given by J. A. Wickham and L. 0. Wickham, apparently for premiums on a policy of insurance issued by appellant. J. A. Wickham died September 9,1011, and Lucy C. Wick-ham was appointed, by the probate court of Dunklin County, administratrix of his estate, received letters…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State ex inf. Crow v. West Side Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Knisely v. LeatheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Gerren v. Hann. & St. Joe. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Wetmore v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Schaefer v. Estate of MagelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- Van Wagner v. SlaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929