Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dean v. Daues

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 28, 1929Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Respondents urge, in their motion for a rehearing of this certiorari proceeding, that the construction given by this court, in Home Insurance Co. v. Wickham, 281 Mo. 300, to the several sections of the Administration Law, or statute, asObiter amended by the General Assembly in 1911, andDictum. particularly the construction given to Section 195, Revised Statutes 1909, as amended in 1911 (now Sec. 186, R.S. 1919), is obiter dictum, and was unnecessary to a decision of that cause; hence, it is insisted that respondents were not bound to follow the construction given to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Madison County Bank v. Suman's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Rassieur v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Keys v. Estate of KeysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Stephens v. BernaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Home Insurance v. WickhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API