Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams v. Adams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1964No. 3293Published

1Dissent

QUINN, Associate Judge:

I dissent from the majority opinion because I find it contravenes the general rule *918that children are not to be deprived of support because of their parents’ misconduct; that it violates the rule of Kephart v. Kcphart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 193 F.2d 677 (1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 944, 72 S.Ct. 557, 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952); and that it emasculates the equitable powers of the Domestic Relations Branch of the trial court by stating that it was without authority to appoint a trustee to dispose of funds held in escrow for the benefit of minor children.

As the majority opinion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kephart v. KephartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Firestone v. FirestoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Naomi E. Jackson v. Franklin B. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  4. Prager v. Smith Ex Rel. PragerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API