Legal Opinion

Gao v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 9, 2004No. 02-73432Published

1Opinion of the Court

*95MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Ge Gao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying Gao asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and voluntary departure. The IJ held that Gao’s asylum claim was time-barred, and he denied all other relief after making an adverse credibility finding. We have no jurisdiction to review Gao’s claims for asylum, relief under the Torture Convention, or voluntary departure. We have…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Lucio Ricardo Alvarez-Santos, AKA Luciano Ricardo Alvarez AKA Lucio Ricardo Alvarez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Alexandru Gui v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Shabanali Ladha Khatoon Ladha Farzana S. Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API