Parman ex rel. Parman v. Lemmon
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hopkins, J.:
The action was one to recover damages for the loss of an eye. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendants appeal.
Two boys, William Lemmon and Emerae Parman, went duck hunting Sunday, October 8, 1922. William was past fourteen and Emerae sixteen. William fired at a hell-diver (dabchick or grebe) on a small pond. Some of the shot glanced on the water to where Emerae was standing, one striking him in one of his eyes, putting it out. Action was brought on behalf of the injured boy against William Lemmon for negligently inflicting the injury, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Parker v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Rene E.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Hulsey v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- State v. DeutscherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.