Pool v. Estate of Shelby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentAlma Wilson, Justice
The majority opinion seriously digresses beyond our established jurisprudence with today’s holding that on its face the “purported revocation” fails to comply with the statutory formalities for the execution of a will. Additionally, the trial court’s findings of testamentary capacity and intent are against the clear weight of the evidence. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
First, the established rule of law in this jurisdiction is that the absence of an attestation clause does not destroy the validity of a will, but only changes the proof required to show that the will was signed and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Hubbell v. HoustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- In Re Estate of LacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- In Re Martin's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Ward v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.