Legal Opinion
Succession of Rixner
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 21, 1895No. 11,885PublishedCited by 8 opinions
A PPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Monroe, J..
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WATKINS, J.
The opponent claims 10 per centum on whatever amount shall be due on decedent’s account to Ignazio Yincanzo de Sarzana, the heir instituted under a will, said heir being domicil-iated in Marcella, and a citizen and subject of the kingdom of Italy, and the succession of the testatrix being administered in the parish of Orleans, Louisiana.
The opposition was, after due proceedings and trial, dismissed, and the executor’s account approved and homologated; and the opponent has appealed.
In the lower court the case was tried and decided upon an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of Del DragoNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- In re the Estate of AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Succession of BrowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Lyons v. VeithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- In re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.