Legal Opinion
Pennington v. Tice
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 18, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-330PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rufe, District Judge.
*581Pro se Petitioner Deandre Pennington has filed objections to the conclusion of the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski that his Petition for habeas corpus relief under § 2254 is untimely. For the reasons that follow, the Court will overrule the objections and deny the Petition.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 17, 2010, having pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated assault1 and one count of criminal conspiracy to commit aggravated assault2 in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Petitioner was sentenced in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chris Johnson v. Kenneth Hollibaugh, The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia, and The Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- ERB v. KAUFFMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023