Opinion No. (1988)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Representative Leist,
¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking in effect:
1. How is the determination made as to whether the office ofCounty Superintendent of Schools has been vacant for one year forpurposes of its abolishment under 70 O.S. 4-101 (1981)? 2. What effect does the answer to question No. 1 have uponcandidates who have filed for vacant but not yet abolishedoffices of County Superintendent of Schools in this year'selections?
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 These questions concern the implementation of a proviso added to 70 O.S. 4-101 (1981), in 1971,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Worley v. State ex rel. AsbillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Hinson v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932