Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 26, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Leist,

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking in effect:

1. How is the determination made as to whether the office ofCounty Superintendent of Schools has been vacant for one year forpurposes of its abolishment under 70 O.S. 4-101 (1981)? 2. What effect does the answer to question No. 1 have uponcandidates who have filed for vacant but not yet abolishedoffices of County Superintendent of Schools in this year'selections?

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 These questions concern the implementation of a proviso added to 70 O.S. 4-101 (1981), in 1971,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Worley v. State ex rel. AsbillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Hinson v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API