Legal Opinion

Roe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1974No. S.F. 23111Published

1Opinion of the Court

12 Cal.3d 884 (1974)

528 P.2d 771

117 Cal. Rptr. 683

HAROLD H. ROE, Petitioner,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

Docket No. S.F. 23111.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

November 27, 1974.

COUNSEL

William H. Whittington, Jr., for Petitioner.

Charles Lawrence Swezey, Sheldon C. St. Clair, Robert A. Seligson, Mullen & Filippi and William J. O'Neil for Respondents.

OPINION

THE COURT.

Petitioner Harold Roe seeks annulment of an award of respondent Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board (Board) in favor of petitioner and against respondent Transport…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Roe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API