Legal Opinion

Dale v. Wright

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Jasper County Court of Common Pleas. cited Clark vs. Rynex, 53 Mo., 380. cited Boggess vs. Cox, 4S Mo., 278; Young vs. Stonebraker, 33 Mo., 117; 4 Blackf. Ind.,158; Cartmill vs. Hopkins, 2 Mo., 220; Boynton vs. Reynolds, 3 Mo., 79; Grimsley vs. Riley, 5 Mo., 280; Walker vs. Keile, 8 Mo., 301; Glasscock vs. Glasscock, 8 Mo., 577; Moreau vs. Detcliemendy, 41 Mo., 431; 1 Wagn. Stat., 274, § 9 ; Id., 278, § 30 ; Patterson vs. Fagan, 38 Mo., 70.

1Opinion of the CourtVories, Judge

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, who were husband and wife, to recover the possession of forty acres of land described in the petition, and charged to be the lands of the wife, which, it was alleged, were wrongfully in the possession ' of the defendants, and withheld from the plaintiffs.

*111The petition was in the usual form. The defendant, by his answer, denied the allegations of the petition, and also set up title to the land in himself by virtue of a conveyance from the grantor of the plaintiffs — of which it was charged that the plaintiffs had notice at the time of their purchase of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boggess v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Robbins v. Lincoln County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1831

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mitchner v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Hatcher v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Geary v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. City of Kansas v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Dickens v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API