Legal Opinion

Garant v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 13, 2020No. 2:18-cv-12619Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PATRICK GARANT, Plaintiff, Case Number 18-12619 v. Honorable David M. Lawson NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESS, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Patrick Garant has multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic, incurable (but treatable) disease that affects the central nervous system. He did not reveal that condition to Norfolk Southern Railway Company when it offered him a job as a train conductor. And…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API