Legal Opinion

Sotheby's Financial Services, Inc. v. Baran

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 2004No. Docket No. 03-7879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Michael Baran, a buyer, seller, and collector of rare gems, entered into an agreement arranged by Paul Russo of Sotheby’s, Inc. (“SI”), to bring gems owned by Brazilian gem dealers (the “Jezzinis”) to auction at SI. According to Baran, Russo told him that there would be three stones and that two would arrive first, the larger of which would sell for more than a million dollars and the third for even more. Bar-an also asserted that Russo told him that the Jezzinis would send the third stone within seventy-two hours after Baran transferred a specified sum of money to the Jezzinis.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Sheth v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Murray v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement v. Maryland National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Marshall Granger & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. LaRubint Corp. v. Joint Stock Company Studio SoyuzmultfilmDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  4. Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC v. Sub-Technical, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API