Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 2018No. COA18-294Published

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*287 On issuance of a writ of certiorari, the State challenges an order granting defendant's motion for reconsideration and motion for appropriate relief. Because the requirements for counsel to advise a defendant of the immigration consequences of a plea agreement established by Padilla do not apply retroactively, we reverse.

In 1997, defendant pled no contest to possessing cocaine with the intent to sell or deliver. In 2015, defendant filed a motion for appropriate relief. Defendant alleged that at the time of his plea, "no factual basis existed in fact or in law to support that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. State v. NkiamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. AlshaifCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. NkiamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API