Legal Opinion

Knostman & Peterson Furniture Co. v. City of Davenport

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Court. — Hon. C. M. Waterman, Judge. Action at law, to recover damages from defendant city, for causing the overflow of water upon the plaintiff’s property. Trial to a jury. Yerdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

I. Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of furniture. Its factory is situated upon the south side of East Front street in the defendant city, and faces north thereon. Wall street and Mississippi avenue are streets which intersect with Front street on the north side thereof; the former just west, and the latter east, of the plaintiff’s factory. These two streets run north and south, and have a decided up-grade to the north, and the surface water from twenty or thirty acres of ground is cast upon these streets, and conveyed down to Front street. At times of heavy rains the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mills v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Keck v. VenghauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Hume v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Aldrich v. PaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. City of Globe v. ShuteArizona Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API