Lockheed Martin Corp. v. L-3 Communications Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PANNELL, District Judge.
This matter is now before the court on Lockheed Martin Corporation’s (“Lockheed”) motion for permanent injunction against prosecution of the dupli-cative Texas action [Doc. No. 4]; L-3 Communications Corporation and L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P.’s (collectively “L-3”) motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to transfer or stay [Doc. No. 13]; and Lockheed’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply and declarations responding to new evidence [Doc. No. 33].
As an initial matter, the court GRANTS Lockheed’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply and declarations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,667 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Helen Echo HayduCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Sutter Corp. v. P & P Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- New England MacHinery, Inc. v. Conagra Pet Products Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lexington Insurance v. RolisonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- RxWound, LLC v. Extremity Care, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- RxWound, LLC v. Extremity Care, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025