Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Watkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 739SC175PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends first that this action as a matter of law is barred by the three years statute of limitations' which statute she properly pleaded. We disagree.

An agreement to sell or purchase real property is governed by the general law of contracts. 7 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Vendor and Purchaser, § 1, p. 489. “Where an option or contract to purchase does not specify the time within which the right to buy may be exercised, the right must be exercised within a reasonable time.” Ibid, § 2, p. 492.

In Lewis v. Allred, 249 N.C. 486, 106 S.E. 2d 689 (1959), Denny, J. (later C.J.)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Claus v. Lee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Harris & Gurganus, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Udzinski v. LovinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Harris v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Williams v. HOUSES OF DISTINCTION, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API