Legal Opinion
State v. Zahl
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
259 N.J. Super. 372 (1992)
613 A.2d 508
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMES F. ZAHL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal), Monmouth County.
Argued May 15, 1992.
Decided May 18, 1992.
Susan J. Weiss, attorney, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Carton, Witt, Arvanitis & Bariscillo, attorneys).
Pamela King, Legal Assistant, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (John A. Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).
OPINION
MILBERG, A.J.S.C.
In this municipal court appeal the defendant has filed a de minimis motion to dismiss his conviction in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- State v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- State v. ZarrilliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- State v. HegyiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re DoeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Matter of John Doe and Roe Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996