Legal Opinion · Dissent

Business Services of America II, Inc. v. WaferTech, LLC

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2012No. 85654-1Published

1DissentMadsen, C.J.

¶17 (dissenting) — Dismissals for want of prosecution protect litigants from dilatory conduct and prevent unresolved and inactive prosecution from cluttering court records. Franks v. Douglas, 57 Wn.2d 583, 585, 358 P.2d 969 (1961). Unfortunately, the majority applies CR 41(b)(1) to hold that the trial court erred in granting defendant WaferTech LLC’s motion for dismissal for want of *314prosecution. But the rule does not apply because plaintiff Business Services of America II, Inc. (BSA) engaged in unacceptable litigation practices, taking this case outside of CR 41(b)(1).

¶18 Dismissal is within…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In re the Guardianship of LambWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Lyle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Apostolis v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API