Legal Opinion
Ross v. Ruffner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 29, 1953No. Appeals, Nos. 87 and 88PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunthee, J.,
The plaintiff, contractors, instituted suit in assump-sit against the defendants to recover the sum of $385.80 for extras on an oral contract. The complaint states that on J une 20, 1950, and before the oral contract was entered into, a written agreement was made between the plaintiffs and defendants for the sale of a certain lot of ground upon which there was being erected a two-story brick veneer dwelling with integral garage, for the sum of $11,000.
We have two appeals to consider; one of William D. Ruffner and Mary Ruffner, his wife, and the other of Frank R. Simica…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- General Motors Truck Co. v. Philadelphia Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hauer v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925