Legal Opinion

Dole v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dot,an, J.

These are two actions of tort. In the first action the plaintiff seeks to recover for the death of her intestate. In the second action the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injury to the motor truck owned by him which was being operated by the intestate at the time of the collision, hereinafter described. The declaration in each case is in two counts, one alleging negligent operation of the defendant’s train, the other alleging failure on the part of the defendant to give the signals required by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 160.

The cases were tried to a jury, who specifically found, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joyce v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Gannett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Gilmore v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Collins v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Gove v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boyd v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Rice v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Verrocchi v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Fay v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Holmes v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API