Haines v. Fearnley
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Jefferson District Court. — Hon. Charles McCall, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues
December 17, 1906, a decree was entered in a statutory proceeding adjudicating and settling the priority and amount of the Fearnley ditch appropriation. Plaintiffs in erros were not parties to, and had no interest in that proceeding; but fearing that the decree contained recitals regarding the right of way of the ditch over their lands, which might be construed as a cloud upon their title, they filed a petition under the statute to reopen the decree. Defendants in error filed in answer to this, what they called a cross bill, alleging that plaintiffs in error in 1907 plowed up and destroyed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Oppenlander v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Rollins v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Hallet v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Platte Water Co. v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Natural Energy Resources Co. v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Faden v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Bingham v. National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Snyder v. Colorado Gold Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Engler v. HatchColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.