Legal Opinion

Rush v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 21, 1978No. 2867-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, A.C.J.

— Plaintiffs John Rush and Fred E. Lepo, Jr., obtained a judgment enjoining defendants Raymon Miller, et al, from constructing a road through the subdivision in which plaintiffs both own property. Crest Builders, Inc., the intervenor below, disagrees with the trial court's interpretation of the language of the restrictive covenants involved here and appeals. We affirm.

In August of 1959, certain restrictive covenants governing the use of land in the first addition of A. P. Johnson's Estates' subdivision were recorded in the Pierce County Auditor's Office. Covenant 5 states:

There…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burton v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Holmes Harbor Water Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Thompson v. SquibbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sandy Point Improvement Co. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Pelosi v. Wailea Ranch EstatesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Lakemoor Community Club, Inc. v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API