Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gilpatric v. Nansen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1925No. 18638. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellants instituted this proceeding under § 1049, subds. 7 and 9, and §§ 1050, 1052, and 1058, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. O. §§7442, 7443, 7445, 7451], to secure the punishment of respondents, and in demnification for the loss of money judgment, under § 1058, supra. The trial court dismissed the application of appellants, who appeal.

Appellant Williams, on November 1, 1923, brought an action in the superior court for Lincoln county against one Harmsen on certain promissory notes. A writ of attachment was issued in that action and placed in the hands of the appellant sheriff for execution. A deputy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taffts v. ManloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Byrd v. Forbes, Washington Territory1887
  3. Cupples v. LevelWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. E. C. Meacham Arms Co. v. Strong, Hackett, & Co., Washington Territory1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tahoma Finance Co. v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API