Legal Opinion
Amoss v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 15, 1989No. 88-1337PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
547 So.2d 716 (1989)
Norman Lester AMOSS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-1337.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
August 15, 1989.
Jeffrey P. Whitton, P.A., Panama City, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for State.
BARFIELD, Judge.
Appellant pled nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 893.13(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1987). He specifically reserved the right to challenge the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Harriel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- State v. DilyerdSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Welch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- State v. LagreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. DeenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. FontanaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.