Legal Opinion

Tuck v. Kellum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1927No. 17276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where a married woman signs a note ostensibly as a maker jointly with her husband, when in fact she is a surety only, before she can establish the fact of her suretyship as against the payee *466of the note it must be made to appear, despite her apparent relationship as principal, that the payee, with knowledge of the facts which would constitute her a surety, contracted with her as a surety. Civil Code (1910), § 3556. Hall v. Rogers, 114 Ga. 357 (40 S. E. 250).

Decided February 24, 1927. Thomas & Thomas, O. J. Tolnas, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, contra.

2. In a suit against a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trammell v. Swift Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Hall v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lovelady v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Allmond v. Mount Vernon BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Boles v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Veal v. VealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Bozeman v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API