Tuck v. Kellum
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where a married woman signs a note ostensibly as a maker jointly with her husband, when in fact she is a surety only, before she can establish the fact of her suretyship as against the payee *466of the note it must be made to appear, despite her apparent relationship as principal, that the payee, with knowledge of the facts which would constitute her a surety, contracted with her as a surety. Civil Code (1910), § 3556. Hall v. Rogers, 114 Ga. 357 (40 S. E. 250).
Decided February 24, 1927. Thomas & Thomas, O. J. Tolnas, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, contra.
2. In a suit against a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Trammell v. Swift Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Hall v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lovelady v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Allmond v. Mount Vernon BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Boles v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Veal v. VealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Bozeman v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.