Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 22, 2011No. Civil Action 99-2496 (GK)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

This civil action brought by the United States under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, is now before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Clarify Order # 1015 Concerning Enforceability [Dkt. No. 5896]. Upon consideration of the Motion, Oppositions, Reply, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion to Clarify is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 17, 2006, this Court issued a lengthy opinion finding that all Defendants “(1) have conspired together to violate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Volvo Powertrain CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Frederick Grede v. FCStone LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API