Lkhagvasuren v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The last paragraph of page four of the slip opinion filed on July 13, 2016, is hereby amended as follows:
We assume without deciding that Matter of N-M- may be applied for the purpose of identifying whether an applicant has *802established the required factual nexus between any purported political whistle-blowing and actual persecution as those terms are defined in the REAL ID Act. / Grava, 205 F.3d at 1181 (requiring the petitioner to show that “the alleged corruption [was] inextricably intertwined with governmental operation”).
With this amendment, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED.
J…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Viktor Yaroslavovich Sagaydak Nataliya Bogdanivna Sagaydak v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Dionesio Calunsag Grava v. Immigrationand Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- N-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Hayk Khudaverdyan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
3Cited by6 opinions
- Justin Santos-Ponce v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Abel Pena-Gonzalez v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Ana Guzman-Ajenel v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Antonio Avendano-Mendiola v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Partap Singh v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.