Legal Opinion

Lkhagvasuren v. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2016No. 13-71778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The last paragraph of page four of the slip opinion filed on July 13, 2016, is hereby amended as follows:

We assume without deciding that Matter of N-M- may be applied for the purpose of identifying whether an applicant has *802established the required factual nexus between any purported political whistle-blowing and actual persecution as those terms are defined in the REAL ID Act. / Grava, 205 F.3d at 1181 (requiring the petitioner to show that “the alleged corruption [was] inextricably intertwined with governmental operation”).

With this amendment, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED.

J…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Viktor Yaroslavovich Sagaydak Nataliya Bogdanivna Sagaydak v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Dionesio Calunsag Grava v. Immigrationand Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. N-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
  4. Hayk Khudaverdyan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Justin Santos-Ponce v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Abel Pena-Gonzalez v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Ana Guzman-Ajenel v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Antonio Avendano-Mendiola v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Partap Singh v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API