Legal Opinion

Justin Santos-Ponce v. Robert Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2021No. 18-72433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN STEEVEN SANTOS-PONCE, No. 18-72433 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A206-794-496 ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 1, 2021 * Pasadena, California Filed February 10, 2021 Before: Ronald M. Gould, John B. Owens, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge VanDyke * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Santiago Pedro-Mateo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Delgado-Ortiz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alexander Minasian v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Alondra Carranza Moreno v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Flor Cruz Lopez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Juan Ponce-Granados v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Sinharib Thomas v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API