Rounseville v. Zahl
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion by defendants Zahl, Way, and Serata for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including a request pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for costs and attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Oral argument was heard on November 11, 1991 in Syracuse, New York. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in its entirety. Further, the court sua sponte dismisses plaintiffs complaint against defendant Barrett and sanctions plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herbert W. Rounseville and Robert Rounseville v. Samuel Zahl, Treva M. Way, and Geoffrey P. SerataCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hall v. DworkinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- The First National Bank of Amarillo v. Southwestern Livestock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Mercedes Tojin-Lux v. Todd Lyons, Acting Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, George Valdez, Acting Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Denver Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Todd Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Executive Office for Immigration Review, and Juan Baltazar, Warden of the Aurora Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026