Legal Opinion

Slayton v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1936No. 6 Div. 963PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Where the state relies on the testimony of an accomplice, in the main, to support an indictment and conviction for a felony, the statute, section 5635, Code 1923, prohibits a conviction unless the testimony of the accomplice is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense. Whether or not such evidence has been adduced by the state is a question for the court. The credibility and weight of such evidence is a question for the jury. If the jury does not believe the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant is entitled to an acquittal;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jacks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Sorrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Skumro v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API