Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronnanita Fluker
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 26, 2012No. 11-1013, 11-3008, 11-3082PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
This case proves the old adage, “If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.” Following a three-week trial, Roy Fluker, Jr. (“Roy Jr.”), Roy Fluker III (“Roy III”), and Ronnanita Fluker (“Ronnanita”), (collectively, the “Appellants”), were found guilty of charges related to their participation in various fraudulent, Ponzi-like schemes that duped victims into investing millions of dollars into programs that were destined to fail. The Appellants were sentenced to prison at separate sentencing hearings. In this consolidated appeal, Roy Jr. and Roy III challenge…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Darrel Smith v. Denise BrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Guy Giovannetti and Nicholas JanisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Eugene Devbrow v. Steven GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Roy Fluker v. Kankakee County, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Gregory WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Strabala v. ZhangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- United States v. Nicholas CejaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.