Legal Opinion

Richards v. Lindquist

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1978No. 8907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In separate actions consolidated for trial, appellant Richards sought to (1) foreclose on a deed of trust securing a promissory note, and (2) set aside a transfer of property allegedly made to defraud creditors. Respondents moved for and were granted summary judgment.

Appellant here contends summary judgment was not proper because numerous issues of material fact are in dispute. Even viewing the record, as we must, in a light most favorable to appellant, we perceive no such dispute in the material facts; accordingly, the district court judgment is affirmed. NRCP 56; Olson v. Iacometti,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olson v. IacomettiNevada Supreme Court · 1975

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sims v. VenemanNevada Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API