Legal Opinion

Sims v. Veneman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1978No. 8969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant sought damages for injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident involving the car which he was driving and that owned by respondent Wilson and driven by respondent Veneman. Respondents moved for and were granted sum*345mary judgment. Appellant here contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment. We disagree.

Summary judgment is appropriate only where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Nevada Land & Mtge. v. Hidden Wells, 83 Nev. 501, 435 P.2d 198 (1967). Here, the undisputed…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nevada Land & Mortgage Co. v. Hidden Wells Ranch, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wiggin v. SanbornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  3. Miller v. Prince Street Elevator Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Olson v. IacomettiNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Richards v. LindquistNevada Supreme Court · 1978

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campos v. Town of PahrumpDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
  2. Local Government Employee-Management Relations Board v. General Sales Drivers, Delivery Drivers & Helpers, Teamsters Local Union No. 14Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Von Zehner v. Truck Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API