Sims v. Veneman
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant sought damages for injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident involving the car which he was driving and that owned by respondent Wilson and driven by respondent Veneman. Respondents moved for and were granted sum*345mary judgment. Appellant here contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment. We disagree.
Summary judgment is appropriate only where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Nevada Land & Mtge. v. Hidden Wells, 83 Nev. 501, 435 P.2d 198 (1967). Here, the undisputed…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Nevada Land & Mortgage Co. v. Hidden Wells Ranch, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Wiggin v. SanbornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- Miller v. Prince Street Elevator Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Olson v. IacomettiNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Richards v. LindquistNevada Supreme Court · 1978
4Cited by3 opinions
- Campos v. Town of PahrumpDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
- Local Government Employee-Management Relations Board v. General Sales Drivers, Delivery Drivers & Helpers, Teamsters Local Union No. 14Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Von Zehner v. Truck Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1983