Legal Opinion

Aguida E. Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 27, 1968No. 17060PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HASTIE, Chief Judge.

The appellant is the beneficiary of a $30,000 insurance policy issued by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company on the life of her late husband, Richard Johnson. She brought this action against the insurer in a New Jersey state court to recover the face amount of the policy. Because of diversity of citizenship the action was properly removed to the United States District Court. On a motion of the defendant insurer for summary judgment, the court entered judgment dismissing the action. 273 F.Supp. 589. The widow has appealed.

Certain facts were admitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Christensen v. New England Mutual LiFe InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Searle v. Allstate Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bernard Lotman and Charles Lotman v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Nielsen v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Atkinson v. Life of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Estate of Galloway Ex Rel. Estate of Galloway v. Guaranty Income Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API