Legal Opinion

People v. Samuel Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1978No. Docket 77-2193PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Van Valkenburg, J.

Defendant was jury convicted of delivery of heroin contrary to MCL 335.341(l)(a); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(a) and conspiracy to deliver heroin contrary to MCL 750.157a(a); MSA 28.354(l)(a). He was sentenced to concurrent terms of from 10 to 20 years and appeals as of right.

An understanding of the issues in the present case requires a brief statement of the pertinent facts. Samuel Smith and Helen Smith, husband and wife, jointly own property at 420 South Thirty-First Street, Saginaw, Michigan, which was alleged to have been a "fortress” for the sale of narcotics to middlemen, who in turn sold to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. AtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. AstaMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. DavenportMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Brownell v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. PeeryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. RobideauMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. SeabrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API