Legal Opinion

State v. Crockett

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 29, 1976No. 7365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The Rochester District Court (Cooper, J.) found Ithe defendant guilty of violating RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1975, Laws 1973, 528:321) which prohibits the operation of motor vehicles “upon any way” by persons under the influence of intoxicating liquor. RSA 259:1 XXXV (Supp. 1975) defines “way” as “any public highway, street, avenue, road, alley, park or parkway ... or any public or private parking lot which is maintained primarily for the benefit of paying customers.” The complaint charged that the defendant had operated his vehicle “on a private driveway opén to the public at the time, to wit,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PetkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. JervisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. State v. ComparoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  5. State v. RosierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SpadeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. State v. ComleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. State v. TardiffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. ProvencherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API