Legal Opinion

Sands v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 17, 2016No. 14-1185PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:

In this matter, the National Labor Relations Board held that a union does not commit an unfair labor practice by failing to tell a prospective member how much money she will save in reduced dues should she choose not to join. But we cannot reach the merits of that decision. Actions undertaken by the union since the filing of this petition for review have rendered the matter moot. For that reason, we dismiss the petition for review as moot and vacate the Board’s order under our equitable authority.

I

In 2004, petitioner Laura Sands began working at a Kroger grocery store…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Public Citizen, Inc. v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  2. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations v. Carl FerrerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Common Purpose USA, Inc. v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Mundo Verde Pub. Charter Sch. v. SokolovCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Molina v. Pa. Soc. Serv. UnionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API