Legal Opinion

Morris v. Wells

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1963No. 39909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The plaintiff in the trial court, Edith N. Wells, brought this action to quiet her alleged title to 92 acres of land. Her claim, of ownership is based upon title by prescription by virtue of over twenty years of adverse possession.

Her pleadings and evidence show that in 1926 John Morris resided upon and owned the property at the time of his death, intestate, in that year. That John Morris was survived by his widow, Mrs. John Morris, who acquired a homestead interest in the property, and shared the remainder interest with their children and grandchildren who are the principal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Burnett v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Gillespie v. DoughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Whitney v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Bonebrake v. FlourneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tatum v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API