Bradford v. Vinton
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The solicitor for the complainant states on his brief that the complainant’s claim to have the deeds set aside,, is based on two grounds — one, upon the presumption of fraud, or constructive fraud, arising out of the relations between the parties; and two, upon actual fraud in procuring the execution of the deeds in question, by which the property was conveyed *265absolutely to the defendant instead of to the St. Georges Trust Company, of which the defendant was treasurer, in trust for the complainant.
Upon the question of constructive fraud, the complainant cites the case of Downs,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hall v. LivingstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1869
- Kyle v. PerdueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Storrs v. ScougaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Gritten v. DickersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. CarrowCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otto v. GoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Levin v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Phillips v. WillisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- Larry Stercula v. Violet Wengert, Bruce Heimbach, Beth Anne Roberts, & Jay K WilsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026