Walling v. Poulsen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; North, J. Assumpsit by Earl G. Walling and Elizabeth Walling against Alfred E. Poulsen for money had and received. A judgment for plaintiffs is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Plaintiffs were owners of a lot in Battle Creek, and defendant is a real estate dealer in the same city. In March, 1907, plaintiffs, intending to leave the city, and desiring to dispose of all their property therein, gave to defendant a list, in which was included the lot in question. Upon that occasion defendant endeavored to secure from plaintiffs a contract for the exclusive handling of the property, but this the plaintiffs declined to give, whereupon plaintiffs testify defendant said:
“Well, this is a pretty good line of property, and I guess I can afford to list it without a contract for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People ex rel. Plugger v. Township Board of OverysselMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Beardslee v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Hannan v. PrentisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Harty v. TeaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Pittsburgh Equitable Meter Co. v. Paul C. Loeber & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Williams v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946