Legal Opinion

Clark v. Hoff Bros. Refuse Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment reversed, with costs, and motion *937denied. Memorandum: This is an appeal from an order and judgment at Special Term granting the motion of respondent Hoff Brothers Refuse Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that no triable issue of fact exists. In April, 1976 Rodney C. Magee was employed by respondent Hoff Brothers Refuse Corporation as a scale operator. His normal working hours were 7:00 a.m. to approximately 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Usually, he worked at the corporation’s eastside transfer station but occasionally when asked he worked…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Lundberg v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Douglas v. HugerichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Jensen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. Jensen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matos v. Michele Depalma Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Reynolds v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  3. Pugsley v. Seneca Foods Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. FIGURA, MICHELLE M. v. FRASIER, TIMOTHY W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Hartford Insurance GroupNew York Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API