Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Lakewood General Hospital

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1966No. 37825PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

— A hemostat is a metal, scissor-like surgical instrument. The device is used by surgeons to check bleeding in the operative field by compressing the tissue or bleeding blood vessels. The plaintiff herein, Mrs. E. M. Conrad, underwent surgery for a malfunctioning gall bladder on June 21, 1963. During the course of the operation, several hemostats were used by the surgeon and his assistant to clamp off blood vessels in the area in which the surgeon and his assistant were working. Unfortunately, one hemostat— not insignificant in size, being approximately 5% inches in length and 2% inches in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCormick v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barr v. Interbay Citizens Bank of TampaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rudeck v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API