Legal Opinion

Boone v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1883No. 8762PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Tenth District Court, Parish of Red River. Logan, J. The plea of discussion is a dilatory plea. State vs. Bradley, Administrator, l An. 643 ; Dwight vs. Linton, 3 Bob. 57. It cannot be allowed after issue joined by default.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Tenth District Court, Parish of Red River. Logan, J. The plea of discussion is a dilatory plea. State vs. Bradley, Administrator, l An. 643 ; Dwight vs. Linton, 3 Bob. 57. It cannot be allowed after issue joined by default. C, P. 333. In relation to improper pleas in the defendant’s answer, the better practice is to object on the trial to any testimony to support such pleas. 21 An. 272; 20 An. 194; 3 Bob. 365. The plea of discussion should be overruled where there is no actual tender of any specific sum to meet the expenses of discussion. C. C. 3403, 3047; Bobeckot vs. Folse,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Fenner, J.

The plaintiffs bring this hypothecary action against the defendant as third possessor of property acquired by him from J. H. Scheen, to subject the same to the payment of a judgment against Scheen, inscribed as a judicial mortgage against the property prior to its transfer to defendant.

C. Chaffe, as syndic of Lisso & Scheen, intervenes, as holder of the note of defendant given for the price of the property to J. H. Scheen, and secured by special mortgage and vendor’s lien, asserting preference and priority over the judicial mortgage of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tremont Lumber Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Succession of BlockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Succession of MoreiraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. Succession of DupreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  5. Succession of DupreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API