Legal Opinion

Henson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2008No. WD 68296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.

Nikole Henson (“Henson”) appeals a judgment on the pleadings in favor of Kenneth Charvat (“Charvat”), an employee of Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”), and a summary judgment in favor of Greyhound on her claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Despite Greyhound’s admission that Charvat was acting in the course of his employment, because of the unusual procedural posture of this case we reverse the judgment in favor of the employee, Charvat, and affirm the judgment in favor of the employer, Greyhound.

Only a brief recitation of the facts is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. Federal Express Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. De Mariano v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Williams v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Wright v. St. Louis Produce Market, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGATHEY v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Sutton v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  3. Tucker v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API